Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lisa Claeys vs Victoria Muntean Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Claeys vs Muntean analysis and find out who is favored!
Lisa Claeys vs Victoria Muntean Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Claeys 0 - 0 Muntean
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Claeys has won 38.17% of points on his second serve, while Muntean has won 39.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Claeys, in recent form, has won 60.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Muntean has won 58.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.55% and 41.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Claeys has saved 49.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Muntean has saved 39.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Claeys has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 8/ 7), with Muntean winning 50% (W/L 18/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Claeys has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7). Muntean has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 115/ 70), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 25/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Claeys has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 8/ 6), where as Muntean has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Claeys has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.73 while Muntean has played against players with an average rank of 186.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Claeys has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Muntean has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Claeys has converted 51.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Muntean has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
641
Rank
435
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
45% (15-18)
Career Total W/L
52% (242-223)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
33% (3-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$860
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lisa Claeys | Victoria Muntean |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 33% (3/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (14/10) | 38% (8/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (127/98) | 45% (85/106) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 30 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:6:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 138.55 | 180.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (236/367) | 65% (413/631) |
| 1st Serve W% | 52% (123/236) | 52% (216/413) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (50/131) | 40% (87/218) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (31/60) | 47% (42/90) |
| Return Pts W% | 52% (199/383) | 47% (322/679) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (7/4) | 38% (3/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 25% (2/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (5/0) |
Lisa Claeys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Dia Evtimova
Player
Lisa Claeys
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Caroline Romeo
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
53%
(
32 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Bela Tamhankar
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dana Baidaulet
Player
Lisa Claeys
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
58%
(
36 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Barbara Dessolis
Player
Lisa Claeys
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Elena Grekul
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Victoria Muntean Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Victoria Muntean
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rinon Okuwaki
Player
Victoria Muntean
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
23%
(
5 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Muntean
Player
Erika Bosaia
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
37 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linea Bajraliu
Player
Victoria Muntean
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Victoria Muntean
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
46
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Muntean
Player
Kate Mansfield
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
62 of
105)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(3) 6-7(2) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ganz
Player
Victoria Muntean
75%
(
77 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
114
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorena Solar Donoso
Player
Victoria Muntean
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
53 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Muntean
Player
Sofia Carpi
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Claeys Vs Muntean Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
